Blog Archives

Watching Thai TV Online

By Anonymous

February 19, 2013

My Thai wife and I spend more and more time outside of Thailand and though she’s acclimated pretty well to the changes, the one thing that she always misses (besides really, really, really spicy Thai food and her family) is television shows from Thailand.

Her English is good enough to watch farang television but what she just like som tom, she gets a craving for shows in her own language. Even I have to admit that I like to watch some of the shows even though my Thai isn’t good enough to completely understand 100% of everything that’s said. Not that I’ve become a Lakorn junkie or anything but I do enjoy watching the local news from time to time just to get the Thai perspective.

So I searched around on the site and couldn’t find any articles about watching Thai TV from overseas so I figured it would make for a good post.

First off, you can always look for Thai videos on YouTube. There are tons of shows that are uploaded there. The big problem is that most of the titles are in Thai script so unless you know the Thai script of the show you want to watch, it’ll be difficult to find.

ThaiTV3While Thai TV3 seemed to be broken when I visited, they claim to show a live stream on the website. Funny enough, another website was showing the live television stream live while ThaiTV’s official site was broken.

Thai TV5 also shows their programming on their website. Personally, I prefer to use their iPhone/iPad app.

Thai PBS also shows their programming on their website.

SeesanTV seems to have a comprehensive listing of Thai television programming for a fee. They also appear to have US and UK shows either dubbed in Thai or with Thai subtitles.

Other TV aggregator sites are ThaiWare and ASEAN IPTV. I haven’t tried it yet but supposedly ASEAN IPTV even has a Roku channel so you can watch Thai TV on your regular television as long as you have a Roku player ($49 – $89 USD). Apparently you have to pay $99 a year for a subscription to ASEAN IPTV’s conteraeraint so I haven’t bit the bullet on that one yet.

Speaking of alternative means of accessing Thai television programs, if you have an iPad or iPhone you have some choices. You can search the iTunes store for “Thai TV” and there seem to be a few apps that stream Thai television programming. I haven’t really used any of these so I can’t vouch for them.

I guess I would be remiss if I did not mention where you could find Thai Lakorn videos. I asked my wife for some sites and she gave me I Heart Lakorns. Recently my wife seems to have found some of her favorite Lakorns on Watch Lakorn so it’s worth giving that one a try too.

Stumblin’ Bumblin’ and Fumblin’

By Sarayuth Chotechompupong

September 23, 2010

If you don’t live in the Kingdom, you might get the impression that since the red-shirt protests reached their violent conclusion four months ago things have settled down to stability and normalcy.

Well, “normal” and “stable” are often relative concepts in Thailand, but this week has seen a number of events pop up that show that the government is struggling… often with itself.

Stumblin’

You may or may not be aware that Thailand does not have nationwide 3G service. In spite of years of planning, no 3G licenses have been issued to mobile phone operators in the Kingdom. That was set to change this week, when three companies were invited to participate in a high-profile and hi-tech auction of two 3G licenses. The auction was planned to begin on Monday.

But there are some people who are opposed to this development. Two weeks ago the labor union representing the workers of CAT Telecom — the Thai state-owned telecommunications company that owns Thailand’s international telecommunications infrastructure including its international gateways, satellite and submarine cable networks connections – went to court seeking to stop the auction, fearing dramatic job losses in the wake of the 3G rollout. Their petition was denied on the basis that the union and employees would not be directly damaged by the auction, therefore they had no standing to bring suit.

The union then pressed the directors of CAT to go to court, and the directors agreed.

Suddenly you had the unusual situation of a State-owned telecom company going to court to stop the government from moving forward with a plan to move Thailand forward in the telecom arena. Effectively you had the State suing itself in court.

In this case, CAT won. At least they won a temporary victory with an injunction to stop the auction until the High Court can rule on whether or not the auction is legal.

The reasoning behind the injunction was explained in a recent Bangkok Post article:

“CAT Telecom insisted the NTC’s licensing authority was based on the out-of-date 1997 constitution. The 2007 charter gave the authority to hand out licences to the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC), which has yet to be formed.”

Basically, CAT is arguing that the NTC, which was organized under the old constitution which was abrogated by the coup-makers of 2006, does not have the authority to issue the 3G licenses. Under the current constitution, put into place in 2007, that authority belongs to the NBTC, which has never been formed.

This leaves the entire question of the future of 3G in Thailand completely up in the air, which is where it has been for several years now.

Stay tuned.

Bumblin’

Another outcome of the tangle of laws resulting from the coup four years ago is the current disarray at the Office of the Auditor General, where the former (or is it current?) Auditor General, Jaruvan Maintaka, insists she still has a legal right to head the office, while her deputy, Pisit Leelawichiropas, has laid claim as caretaker of the top job.

This mess started when K. Jaruvan turned 65 years old back in July. Everyone expected her to retire, but she didn’t.

Why not? Well, the reason is that K. Jaruvan says that she doesn’t believe there is any provision under the existing law to replace her, and she feels that she could be sued for dereliction if she failed to carry out her duties.

More from the Bangkok Post:

“The question arose because a bill covering the selection of the auditor-general and the State Audit Commission has not been approved by the Senate….

Without the law in place, the selection of a new auditor-general could not go ahead. The state auditor has asked the Council of State to interpret the bill’s status.

Khunying Jaruvan has refused to quit despite the fact she reached the mandatory retirement age on July 5.
Council of State secretary-general Porntip Jala yesterday said Announcement No.29, issued by the 2006 coup makers led by Gen Sonthi Boonyaratkalin, stated the auditor-general at that time would continue in the job until Sept 30, 2007, after which a new auditor-general had to be chosen within 90 days.”

Since no new Auditor-General has been named, K. Jaruvan has decided that she must stay on and take care of her duties.

This turned into a fiasco recently, according to a report in the Bangkok Post:

The problem is that her deputy, K. Pisit, sees it differently. He says that since his (former?) boss has reached the mandatory retirement age, he is now the acting Auditor-General, and he seems to be intent on carrying out those duties.

“The wrangle over the leadership at the Office of the Auditor-General has descended into farce as rival leaders grappled with a chair and a microphone while trying to take centre stage at an executive meeting.

The meeting fiasco yesterday reflected the difficulties faced by the agency as the leadership dispute continues.

Former auditor-general Jaruvan Maintaka, who insists she still has a legal right to head the office, and her deputy, Pisit Leelawichiropas, who has laid claim as caretaker of the top job, physically fought to grab a chair and a microphone during a meeting of about 40 executives and 20 staff.

The incident brought the monthly meeting to an end even before it had really started.

Mr Pisit said he called the meeting to wrap up issues in preparation for the arrival of the new fiscal year next month.

While he was sitting in the chairman’s seat, Khunying Jaruvan reportedly abruptly turned up, approached him and slammed files of documents on to the table. Witnesses said she tried to push him from the chair and grabbed a microphone from his hand.

“She hit my shoulders several times, saying she wanted to take the chairman’s role,” Mr Pisit said.
“The meeting could not start so I decided to leave,” he said, adding Khunying Jaruvan continued the meeting with “her staff”. Officials who agreed to report to him left the room, he said.

Someone then cut off the power to the room leaving her team working in the dark, he said.”

Amazing!

Fumblin’

When the current government of Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva came to power, one of its stated objectives was to improve relations with Saudi Arabia, which had been strained for some time.

This week saw that objective slip a little further away with the recent promotion of Pol Lt-Gen Somkid Boonthanom from commissioner of Provincial Police of Region 5 to assistant national police chief.

Why would that harm relations with Saudi Arabia, you ask?

Because Pol Lt-Gen Somkid is under indictment in Thailand for alleged involvement in the unsolved disappearance of Saudi businessman Mohammed al-Ruwaili in Bangkok 20 years ago.

The Saudi authorities were not impressed with this guy being promoted, and they have complained. Loudly and longly.
The Bangkok Post, on the 19th of September, carried a story with a headline that read, “PM meets ‘ill-informed’ Saudi envoy

Here are some key excerpts from that news report:

“Mr Abhisit met with Saudi charge d’affaires Nabil Hussein Ashri at Ban Phitsanulok.

He explained to Mr Ashri that under Thai law, the senior policeman’s promotion was appropriate due to a blanket amnesty given to all state employees facing disciplinary charges on the occasion of His Majesty the King’s birthday in 2007.

Pol Lt Gen Somkid was given amnesty relating to the disciplinary measures facing him, thus enabling him to be promoted to a higher rank.

The amnesty does not pertain to criminal matters….

Mr Abhisit said he wanted to speak to the Saudi envoy personally, as it would be a more efficient than explaining the matter via documents.

According to Mr Abhisit, the Saudi envoy seemed to have insufficient information about the matter.
The Saudi embassy has repeatedly expressed concerns about the promotion of Pol Lt Gen Somkid, but the government has steadfastly defended it.

Saudi Arabia, citing Thailand’s National Police Act, claimed Pol Lt Gen Somkid should be suspended from active duty because he faces a criminal trial.”

Probably no one will be surprised to learn that the Bangkok Post headline the following day read, “Saudi envoy blasts govt, insists he is ‘informed‘”

“I’m well-informed, not ill-informed,” he thundered in a statement responding to Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva’s comments on Saturday after meeting with him at Ban Phitsanulok….

Reaffirming Saudi Arabia’s policy of non-interference in Thailand’s internal affairs, the diplomat said it was his duty to negotiate the issue with the Thai government to avoid more tension or undesirable complications in bilateral ties.
“Nonetheless, I strongly object to comments made by Thai officials to the public claiming my misunderstanding or ‘ill information’ of local issues and laws regarding the promotion of Pol Lt Gen Somkid,” he said.

Mr Ashri said the embassy has not yet received any clarification or official notice regarding Pol Lt Gen Somkid’s promotion.

“Therefore, hoping that I, or the Saudi authorities will understand this issue will not be an easy matter, because it seems that different officials refer to different sets of laws and regulations to clarify this issue to us.

“Perhaps the confusing and unclear statements made by officials on this subject have led to the assumption that the issue was cleared to us but that we misinterpreted the laws which is absolutely not true; and we have no official clarification until now.”

He said it was incomprehensible that a person charged by the state with a serious crime such as murder was promoted.”

By the 21st of September the Bangkok Post was reporting that Pol Lt-Gen Somkid was being asked to step down:

“Mr Che-arming, chairman of the House committee on security of the state, said he made this call bdcause he realised that Pol Lt-Gen Somkid was the only one who could restore ties between Thailand and Saudi Arabia.”

So there you have it folks; a Police Lt-General is the only person in Thailand who can restore diplomatic ties with Saudi Arabia!

As it turned out, two days later, that’s exactly what Pol Lt-Gen Somkid did.

There’s never a really boring day in the Thai political scene.

February is Spicy Month

By Admin

February 10, 2010

So we bid farewell to the first month of 2010.

Here in Thailand that means that the tourists numbers will begin to trickle off and the temperatures (and humidity) will begin rising daily over the next few months. But for those of us living here, we may not even need to wait until Songkran to see the worst temperatures of the year.

The country is anxiously awaiting the verdict on whether or not the government can confiscate 76 billion baht (about $2.375 billion USD) from former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra who was ousted in a 2006 coup. Some speculate that he’s lost a fortune in the Dubai collapse and so this last $2 billion or so is really, really, really important to him (he denies he’s experiencing any financial difficulties).

At issue is whether or not he used his office as head of the country to enrich himself and his family. Amongst other charges some are questioning whether the former PM and former head of one of Thailand’s largest cellular network providers may have used the office of the Prime Minister to make subtle changes to the tax law that allowed him to avoid paying taxes on his mult-billion dollar stake in AIS.

That’s really neither here nor there though. In Thailand he’s either a saint or evil incarnate depending on who you talk to. There doesn’t seem to be much middle ground where he’s concerned.

Many of his supporters are calling Feb 26th their final stand and have been busy stoking the fires that a possible coup is immanent. Who and why a coup would be staged is a little murky as the military’s head-honcho (Army Chief Gen Anupong ) is not shy about expressing his dislike of Thaksin. Any coup arising from the current power structure would only be a means to take a hard line stance against Thaksin as some are growing frustrated that the current government has not shut him up and still allows him to cause problems.

Another possible scenario would be if the good general’s subordinate officers decided to throw him out with the government in a pro-Thaksin coup. Some cite a recent Twitter post by Thaksin as an indication such a plan may be in the works.

“Thais in all foreign countries should get prepared, especially those who love democracy. If a coup is staged, we will form a government in exile together. Now, I have not set it up yet. I must wait for a coup to take place first.”

But that plan may have been killed last week when Gen. Anupong gave one of the thorns in his side, Maj Gen Khattiya Sawasdiphol, a very public bitch-slap when he removed him from his command. Other commanders sensing now would be a good time to demonstrate where your loyalties lie lest you find yourself also on Anupong’s shit-list staged rallies of their troops to denounce Gen Khattiya’s disloyalty and pledge their support for Gen. Anupong.

In a strange twist of events, Gen Khattiya has upped the ante since his public rebuff. He’s been quoted as saying “I want to warn judges to be careful both before and after judgment day because I don’t know when they’re going to shoot you. The gunman may be a professional killer or a hit man hired by people, because now the red shirts have become fanatical with patriotic sentiment as they feel they do not receive justice.”

Since Khattiya is also a well-known red shirt (Thaksin) supporter and he has made suspiciously similar predictions regarding red shirt violence right before it occurred many view his remarks as a threat rather than well-intentioned advice.

He may have played himself right into a corner which would provide some evidence of how desperate the upcoming days will become with so much on the line for both sides. If he is aware of a specific assassination plot his words obligate him to reveal what he knows or be considered to be a conspirator. If is unaware of a specific threat then he could be charged with attempting to intimidate the court.

Ahh, Thai politics can be so interesting.

Thanksin Crosses the Point of No Return . . . . Again. Really This Time

By Admin

April 21, 2009

Every time the ante gets upped in this ongoing struggle between the reds and yellows someone inevitably says that Thaksin has crossed the point of no return.  But this is Thailand so just when you think you’ve seen it all, boom!, something even more surprising happens.

Thanksin has been taking pot shots at the government, Prem, and pretty much everybody . . . except the king . . . until now.

In the Financial Times Thaksin says:

“General Surayud, Gen Prem [Tinsulanonda, the senior member of the privy council] and another privy councillor went to have an audience with his majesty the king and told his majesty that they will do favour for him by getting me because I am not loyal to the king,” Mr Thaksin said. “That started the whole process.”

Well, I guess just short of hurling personal insults at the king that is pretty much as far as one can go.

It should be interesting to see if he loses any support due to his effort to sully the king’s reputation.  Many of the red shirts L-O-V-E the king.  Thaksin pointing a finger in the king’s direction might force them to make a choice in where their allegincies are.

On the other hand, I’m not sure a lot of the red shirt crowd read the Financial Times.  Who knows?

Round Two: Everyone Loses By Tulsathit Taptim

By Admin

April 11, 2009

An interesting OpEd piece in The Nation from Tulsathit Taptim.

Even though Thaksin Shinawatra may be laughing, there is no winner after the Pattaya infamy

Pattaya will lose billions of baht. Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva has lost his face, and his job is under greater threat. To other Thais, Songkran has been pretty much spoiled. Thailand’s image as a whole has taken a new hit. Economically struggling Asean has to defer discussing some crucial plans. The red-shirted movement, while having achieved a key objective of preventing the Asean summit with dialogue partners, can’t be content with the glaring truth that, like its rival People’s Alliance for Democracy, it has become its own worst enemy.

And Thaksin Shinawatra will only get brief satisfaction from the turmoil in Pattaya that led to the cancellation of the summit and declaration of state of emergency which leaves everything hanging in the balance. He will be cheering a “triumph” of his supporters in the next address through video link, but deep down he must know that he is not fighting to win, that to get even is the best he can get. He has been way past of the point of no-return, and what happened in Pattaya on Saturday only serves to lengthen the distance between the man and his motherland.

The biggest loss, however, belongs to us, no matter what colours of the shirts we are wearing. The political divide was not about to be bridged any time soon, but the Pattaya incident has further dimmed the fragile hope. We had wanted things to improve, but now we would be glad if they don’t get any worse.

It’s been an-eye-for-an-eye showdown. You can seize Government House, so we can block city traffic. You can take over the airport, so we can torpedo an international summit. You fight for democracy that rejects corrupt polticians, we can fight for democracy that respects the voices of the poor.

A common sense of national values has been a long-time victim, who was beaten to near death on Saturday. The nation has lost its way for some time, and the Pattaya infamy ensures there will remain no light at the end of the tunnel in the foreseeable future. The vunerable national harmony has been dealt a new blow, and the threat to nationhood has never looked more real.

Those involved in the years-long power struggle have done their best to make sure that politics affects everyone’s life. Too bad the general Thais have only been feeling the negative effects of a war that those responsible insisted was for a greater good. We have come to learn that perhaps people go into war not because they are different. Maybe what has been happening was caused by the fact that we are all too much alike.

Personally, I think Khun Tulsathit is underestimating the impact of this continued unrest. Surely Pattaya will lose billions of baht but much like the airport crisis the ripple effect will be felt throughout Thailand.

A friend of mine joked to me the other day that when he first used to tell people he was going to Thailand on holiday they would snicker and joke that he was going for the nightlife and girls. Now when he mentions going to Thailand on holiday they ask him whether or not he feels safe here.

In light of the world-wide financial meltdown growing an image as a politically unstable country which can be ground to a halt via relatively unarmed demonstrators is possibly the worst thing Thailand can do. While this battle between red, yellow, blues, and whatever the new color of the week is next week, plays out decisions are being made in corporate boardrooms across the world that could impact Thailand’s economic growth for decades.

As Khun Tulsathit points out there are no winners in this race to the bottom. Even if the demonstrators disappeared tomorrow whoever is in power will be facing a monumental task of leading Thailand out of a financial catastrophe. So far no politician inspires any great confidence that they can shoulder that burden.

Can Thailand Turn Lemons Into Lemonaide?

By Admin

December 6, 2008

I certainly don’t wish anyone hard times or any sort of financial despair but let’s face it, what I write isn’t really going to make a difference whether or not it actually happens.  All I can do is speculate on what happens if government predictions hold true and tourist numbers are cut in half in 2009.  Obviously it’s going to hurt a lot of people but might there be a silver lining?

First off, I tend to believe the government tourism estimates though I recognize that it’s more than a little self-serving for them to quote massive tourism number declines as a result of the PADs actions.  The reason I’m prone to believe their numbers is that this seems like the straw that breaks the camel’s back for a lot of visitors I’ve spoken to.  Not only do you have the 350,000 (and counting) stranded passengers in Bangkok but many a single man has saved up all year and banked his entire holiday on coming to Thailand (especially true in the US where people only get 10 days per year).  Believe me, if I had been trudging through my dismal job all year with only my 10 glorious days in Thailand keeping me going I would be well pissed off right now when I saw that there’s a good chance that normal airport operations may not resume until well into my holiday.

As I get emails from friends and families back in various parts of Farangland it’s obvious they think I’m in the middle of Faluja with bombs going off on every street corner and mobs of anti-government protesters roaming the streets.  Though I can only chuckle at the over-dramatization it does indicate to me that if any of these people had even the remotest thought of listening to all the good things I’ve said about Thailand and planning a trip for themselves those ideas are long gone.  As far as they’re concerned all of Thailand is in a state of chaos.  No television ad or tourism slogan is going to bring them over here anytime soon.

And that’s just the tourism side.  Don’t think that every major airline that has been using BKK as a SEA hub isn’t meeting to discuss whether they can afford to have aircraft costing hundreds of millions of dollars sitting on the tarmac in Thailand anymore.  Business analysts working for thousands of companies all across the globe are burning the midnight oil as we speak putting together contingency plans on where else they might trade or build business operations in the region.  Hell, when Vietnam starts looking more politically stable than your country you’ve really screwed the pooch.

The World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators ranks Thailand’s political stability at 16.8 out of 100 (down from 44.7 in 2007).  Risk measurement companies around the world are downgrading Thailand and have for some time.  And these are the people that big multi-national companies rely on to advise them of the risk associated with their overseas investments.

Then there’s the whole supply chain problem.  Many businesses around the globe rely on getting fresh produce, medicines, etc from Thailand.  A shipment of produce sitting in the airport for the last week is as good as garbage.  Those trading partners on the other side of the globe are going to find new suppliers to get them through the crisis here.  Once they find reliable suppliers in other countries many may never want to deal with their Thai suppliers again.  Of if they do they’ll diversify their risk by sourcing from different suppliers in different countries thus their purchases of Thai products will drop.

Thailand’s real estate market has weathered past downturns reasonably well but can it do the same this time?  I was reading just the other day that many real estate agents are reporting zero market activity in the last several weeks.  Literally, they’ve sold nothing and have no indications of interest coming in.  And this is supposed to be one of the strongest seasons for them!   Potential overseas buyers aren’t returning phone calls.  Vacation home purchasers are foregoing their deposits and backing out of condo purchases.

I popped into one of the Soi Cowboy bars last night and spoke to one of my long-time friends who works there.  She was floored at how quiet it was.  She told me that several customers who had been in over the weekend and were trying to get out of Bangkok said they were never coming back to Thailand.  She told me that with a laugh but the laugh didn’t disguise her nervousness.

I dropped into Long Gun and there were maybe five punters in the place.  Suzie Wong’s only had two.  Baccara where it is often difficult to find a seat had no such capacity problems last night.  Is this what all of 2009 is going to look like?

According to Wikipedia Thailand’s tourism industry accounts for roughly 6% of their GDP.  Personally, I think that number is bullshit.  Other than hotels and airlines the tourism industry in Thailand is an all cash business which means hundreds of millions or perhaps even billions of baht aren’t being accounted for.  How many bar girls claim a single baht of income from prostitution?  Do massage parlors count as part of the tourism industry?  There’s an entire underground economy that I don’t think is being accounted for in the official government estimates so whatever the impact the government predicts is likely to be far, far worse.

But then there’s the ripple effect which follows how the money flows through the system.  Two thousand baht paid by some punter to a bar girl goes in a lot of different directions once it leaves his wallet.  Some will be spent by her directly on things like housing, food, mobile, and clothing.  Another part of her money gets sent back up to Isaan to her parents who also use it for housing, food, and clothing.  And each place that money is spent someone is booking that as revenue.  If that punter never gets on a plane to come to Thailand then not only is she out the 2000 baht but a whole chain of people lose their little portion of that revenue.

On the scale of a single punter and a single bar girl the effect is ridiculously miniscule.  Obviously no food vendor in Isaan is going to go out of business over a lost 5 or 10 baht that would have flowed to him from that single transaction but if, as predicted, tourist arrivals drop to 6 million in 2009 that 5 or 10 baht becomes 37.5 – 75 million less baht.  If every single one of those 7.5 million missing tourist arrivals would have averaged only one LT relationship with a girl that’s a staggering 15,000,000,000 baht in lost economic activity.

But maybe this is what Thailand needs.  When I said earlier that for some this may be the straw that broke the camel’s back there’s a built in assumption that this was not the only straw.  The escalating prices, ever more sophisticated scams, increasingly rude and obnoxious behavior of the girls, deteriorating levels of service, etc are the other straws burdening this camel.  One by one the pillars of what drew a lot of people to Thailand have been crumbling for some time.

In a way an implosion was inevitable.  I’ve read several Stickman posts where he discusses places like Cambodia and the Philippines and the fact that some punters are exiting Thailand for those places.  His posts always seem to end on a note that while things aren’t what they used to be in Thailand he’s not ready to make that jump yet.  There was always that “yet” that seemed to imply if things kept getting worse other places might start to look more attractive.  If you’re chasing a lifestyle and that lifestyle no longer exists then it’s time to move on.

So where is this silver lining that I suggested earlier?  Well, maybe it wakes some people up!  Maybe some farang and Thai visionaries arise who actually understand that you cannot keep expecting more while providing less.  You cannot run a third world country and charge first world rates.  You cannot promise the charm of Thai culture and thrust a bunch of touts and scam artists in people’s faces the second they step off the plane.

There are a lot of things that need fixing in Thailand and maybe if the Thai economy suffers enough pain perhaps it will make the government, businesses, and people wake up and realize that it’s in their best interest to fix these problems.  Whether it be revitalizing the tourist areas around Sukhumvit and Silom or opening up property and business ownership to foreigners, there are things that Thailand needs to do and has needed to do for a long time in order to keep the economy strong.

Right now Thailand is like a farmer who has been given a large plot of land that is yielding plentiful crops who just keeps farming it and farming it until he’s extracted all the nutrients from the soil leaving it barren and is then unable to feed even himself.  As far as Thailand is concerned the supply of stupid tourists is endless.  Chew them up and spit them out.  Buddha will just keep sending more.    And if Buddha quits sending you farangs, no problem, China and India have dumb tourists too.

Well now the tourists are gone as is much of Thailand’s reputation as a healthy business environment (which was questionable to begin with).  Thailand has two options; it can sit back and simply wait until people forget how screwed up it is or it can use this as an opportunity to act aggressively and lure investment and tourism back into the country.

If they go the sit and wait route things could get very, very ugly in Thailand.  I’m not talking about bars being forced to close and people having to tighten their belt a little kind of ugly.  I’m talking about the really ugly stuff that happens when an economy implodes; violent crime, drugs, forced prostitution, kidnappings, etc.

I think most people will agree that the pain and suffering are inevitable at this point so I’m not speculating on these things in the hope that Thailand gets rocked financially.    I’m simply looking at a situation that is almost guaranteed to shape up badly and trying to understand where things go from here.  Sometimes it is desperate times that open the door to new opportunities.  When people are removed from their comfort zone it becomes easier to make choices that would have been difficult under the status quo.

I’m not smart enough to propose what the solution should be but I think that the people of Thailand might be ready to hear from someone other than a Thaksin supporting group or the PAD.  Perhaps politicians who understand why Thaksin is so popular with the rural poor and also understand the issues that brought rise to the PAD might be in order.  Or maybe it’s business leaders who take advantage of an ailing economy and pressure the government to make reforms for the sake of the country’s business interests.

Whatever the answer is it likely won’t be easy but with the economy in shambles making hard choices might be a lot easier.

Thailand’s Coming ‘Inflation Tsunami’ Threatens to Wash Away Decade of Growth

By The Ghost

July 21, 2008

As much as I would love to focus on just the fun Pattaya has to offer, it’s getting pretty difficult to ignore what’s happening to this country. Thailand increasingly feels like it’s being ripped apart.

Hundreds to thousands of people daily are protesting in Bangkok’s streets against the government and, now, the national police. Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej, pigeon-holed as a puppet for deposed PM Thaksin Shinawatra, has become a national joke and his 6-month administration has yet to pass a law or even fill most of the ministerial positions needed to do so.

Deadly attacks have spiked again in the South after months of relative calm. The country’s finance minister admits he’s relying on Buddhist texts to steer monetary policy while, across the globe, financial institutions are removing Thailand from their lists of places to invest. And, meanwhile, the country’s major opposition party has decided that bickering with Cambodia over U.N. recognition of an ancient temple is more important than dealing with any of these issues.

It’s hard to believe it could get any worse. But it just might. Because looming above all Thailand’s problems with corruption, politics and incompetence is a threat to the country’s economy not seen since the crash of 1997: a so-called “Inflation Tsunami.”

Chart courtesy ThaiCrisisEven as Thailand’s leaders have frittered away the past months arguing, suing and back-biting each other, the country has been barreling down the road to financial ruin. Inflation soared to 8.9% in June and is universally predicted to top 10% this month and as much as 12% in August. And that’s just consumer-rate inflation. Thailand’s Producer Price Index for June soared to 18.6%, meaning manufacturers were eating almost 10% of inflation rate on behalf of consumers, something that will not continue.

“The idea (of the inflation tsunami) is very basic,” explains the respected economic blog Thailand Crisis: “Higher prices spread from raw materials and commodities to intermediary goods, then to finished goods. Business margins start to be under severe pressure. At some point they can’t take it anymore, so they increase their own prices, even for services. That increases pressure on the people who, in turn, start to demand higher wages, etc.”

More than just a vicious circle, the secondary effects do more than simply go around and around, they grow larger and stronger with each revolution, just as a tidal wave will suck all the water from the beach before crashing down on it, destroying everything in its wake.

Thailand More Vulnerable to Worldwide Problems

Fueled by runaway oil prices, wildfire inflation is not limited to Thailand, of course. The Philippines’ inflation rate hit 14% last month and the same “tsunami” term is being used to describe threats to Pakistan, India, Turkey, Brazil and others across the developing world. Even the United States is threatened by the tsunami effect.

“Whether it is anecdotal or statistical evidence, I see inflation everywhere, and this is where the financial tsunami cometh,” wrote Bennet Sedacca, president of Florida-based money-management firm Atlantic Advisors LLC in a June 25 report. Sedacca wrote that current financial-market conditions remind him of “someone standing on a lonely beach, armed with only a small bucket, trying to stop a rare tsunami that hits the shores.”

The threat to Thailand, however, may even more grave due to a host of questionable economic, policy and political decisions made by its leaders as well as the composition of the country’s economy.

Price controls, fuel subsidies, cheap credit, budget deficits, pork-barrel spending and a weakening currency are all exacerbating the oil-driven inflation problem. Factor in the external effects of worldwide inflation – skyrocketing airfares, airline cutbacks and a threat of global recession – and Thailand is poised to crumble under the weight of soaring prices and plummeting revenues.

External Pressures

A host of airlines last week announced cuts in long-haul routes to Thailand, stating they believed the Tourism Authority of Thailand’s projection of 15 million visitors this year was overstated. Lufthansa executives said they saw tourist arrivals increasingly at most 13 million for the year. Two days later, several short-haul low-cost carriers announced route cuts of their own, citing low passenger loads and rising fuel costs. And all of that comes after Thailand’s own flag carrier, Thai Airways International, dropped its direct New York service and scaled back it’s Los Angeles-direct route.

And today, just as this story was published, TAT sharply cut its 2009 projected growth to just 3.3%. The original projection was a 10% increase in international travelers to a total 17 million.

Even TAT itself may be quietly writing off the western visitors who have made Pattaya, Phuket and Samui their holiday destinations of choice. A TAT council on sports and recreation last week requested permission to shift resources away from marketing in the West to open more offices in India and China. Even TAT’s (and Pattaya’s) brightest spot over the past three years – Russia – may be in trouble:

“Tourists with high incomes have already been to Thailand and Cuba more than once, and tours there will become simply inaccessible for middle-income clients because of the price,” Inna Beltyukova of Moscow-based travel agent Capital Travel told Russian online daily Kommersant this week.

Internal Damage

If Thailand’s elected officials and bureaucrats are worried about all of this, you couldn’t tell it from what they’re saying. Some, in fact, have chosen to play ostrich, simply proclaiming there is no problem and everything is running as normal.

“The Commerce Ministry remains optimistic the oil-price spurt may have run out of gas and that oil prices will not rise as expected in the remaining months, so it has left its annual target unchanged at 5.5 percent for the year,” reported The Nation newspaper last week.

Chart courtesy of ThaiCrisisBut the Commerce Ministry is not alone. Despite Commerce’s very own figures reporting consumer inflation at 8.9% in June, the Bank of Thailand said it is sticking with its prediction of 4%-5% annual inflation while the National Bureau of Statistics reaffirmed its projection of only 5.3% to 5.8% inflation for the year.

Of course, if Thai officials actually admitted their figures were wrong, they’d also have to explain the reasons behind the sudden price spikes. Justifying to the public that magnitude of economic mismanagement would be nearly impossible.

The reason is because, when you start to dig into the foundation of Thai economic policy, you’ll find its built upon hopes, dreams and speculation.

Take, for example, the idea of price controls. Politicians have been telling Thailand’s residents that they’ve been protecting our best interests by regulating the price of everything from laundry powder to Coca-Cola. Producers were unable to raise prices to the consumer this year on nearly four dozen widely used consumer products. But the prices for oil, sugar, rice and other base commodities have risen so strongly that the government was forced to lift the controls and have not imposed any new ones.

That only fuels the Inflation Tsunami even more, because, rather than let the market adjust prices gradually, the government holds back inflation until it burst through a dam, moving more quickly, strongly and widely than it otherwise would have. Also, If each commodity had risen slowly and independently, the average consumer could have adjusted their budget along the way, rather than face a sudden, unexpected shock the next time they went to the supermarket.

More Market Distortions: Subsidies & Cheap Credit

Chart courtesy of ThaiCrisisOn the flip side of price controls are an equally damaging force: subsidies. As ThaiCrisis succinctly explains, holding down the price of diesel fuel, for example, prevents prevents people from making rational budget decisions, such as whether to buy a new car or buy items on their shiny new credit card.

Credit, as well, is another factor pushing the country toward economic meltdown. For 32 of the past 50 months, Thailand’s “real” interest rate – the Bank of Thailand’s interest rate minus the inflation rate – has been negative. That means, for all intents and purposes, that borrowed money is not only free, but that the government is actually rewarding borrowers financially by going into debt.

Negative interest rates are a valid short-term economic policy used to lift economies out of recession, etc. But it’s extraordinarily dangerous as a long-term strategy. It distorts rational business planning and leads to the kind of real estate bubble Bangkok and Pattaya are now experiencing.

Perhaps that’s why the Bangkok Post recently reported that 40% of all Bangkok condominium projects now being built will fail in the next two years due to not being sold. There simply were too many buildings put up due to the fact that it cost virtually nothing to finance them.

Pattaya is not far behind. Speaking recently with a friend who owns 24 condos in Pattaya and Jomtien Beach, he said this area’s property market is like nothing he’s ever seen. “Prices keep going up while demand keeps going down. Pricing is being done on pure speculation.”

And, he added, because much of the land sought after by developers is owned by Thais and lying vacant and dormant, there’s virtually no incentive form them to lower prices to sell it. “They’re content to wait until some poor sucker comes along and pays their price.”

Construction Zone (The Ghost)With the baht now weakening badly (and this being Pattaya), you know some Farang will do just that. But while the weaker baht may be good news for the British or American tourist who can actually afford the double-priced airfares to Thailand, the falling currency is even more bad news for the Thai economy.

For the past two years, the Bank of Thailand has done everything it could to weaken the baht as it surged to historic highs. But now that the oil Thailand imports so much of has to be paid for in dollars, the BoT has reversed course and is trying like mad to stem the fall of the currency.

Market intervention (selling dollars for baht) has never worked long-term and the BoT is being undermined by Thailand’s elected officials who continue to try to buy votes through spending on needless mega-projects in the countryside. The pork-barrel spending comes at the cost of the country’s budget deficit. The higher the deficit, the more downward pressure on the baht. The lower the baht, the higher the price of oil and the higher the inflation rate goes.

The Inflation Tsunami Rolls On

It’s all good and well to talk macroeconomics and line charts, but what does it mean to your average Somchai – or a visitor to / resident of Pattaya for that matter. True, as the tsunami first began to form, all of this might have been academic to a guy sitting on a barstool at the local go-go bar. But look around and the effects are becoming pretty evident.

Pattaya’s empty bars are but the most obvious sign. While some bars are still packing in enough punters to turn a profit, many bars are proclaiming ’08 to be the worst low season ever. And with some roundtrip fares from the U.S. now at $2,000 and 1,500 pounds form the U.K., it doesn’t look to get any better. Recently the head of one of the largest travel agents in Australia told a luncheon audience that he expects long-haul air travel to drop 40% in the next two years due to fuel surcharges alone. And that, he said, is only if the entire globe doesn’t plunge into oil-fueled recession.

Beyond the airfares, the region is already seeing the effects of inflation. Hotel rates, food, beer prices, taxi fares, and even fees for recreational activities such as jet ski rentals and scuba diving have all increased in recent months as companies have had to increase salaries for staff and pay more for fuel and basic goods. And, of course, Pattaya’s legions of working girls are feeling it even worse, given the dramatic rise in rice prices and the stagnant state of salaries. Pattaya’s mongers will increasingly feel the bite of inflation when the rate their quoted for an evening’s entertainment is suddenly a lot higher than on their last visit here.

The End Isn’t Nigh … Yet

So is financial collapse inevitable? No. But getting control of the tsunami before it washes away 11 years of Thailand’s growth won’t be easy.

The most-common tool to reign in inflation is by raising interest rates, which the BoT almost certainly will do later this week. As we saw above, Thailand needs to raise interest rates a great deal just to put resolve its cheap credit problem. But the BoT is only expected, at most, to boost rates by half a percent.

The fact is there’s only so much the central bank can do. Yes, higher interest rates will strengthen the baht, make oil cheaper and dampen inflation. But it also makes financing more expensive. While economists argue that, in Thailand’s case that’s a good thing, the fact is that developers, big companies and others reliant on credit would cut back investment. Consumers would buy fewer cars, condos and houses. Raise rates too much and the BoT stalls an economy whose growth has already been cut from 6% to 4.5% this year.

The rest is largely up to the government, if it can ever begin functioning as one. Subsidies need to be removed and price controls eliminated. It’s doubtful either will happen entirely. Likewise, don’t expect to see an end to deficit spending. What likely will happen is that the light bulb will eventually go on in the Finance and Commerce ministries and real plans will be formulated to battle inflation. One can only hope it won’t be too late.

Of course, Thailand is not in total control of its destiny. Should oil bust through $170 and the baht weaken to near 40 to the dollar, inflationary pressures and currency market speculation may become too strong. In that case, you’re looking at 1997 all over again. Brits will rejoin at 130 baht to the pound and Americans at 90 to the dollar, but once they arrive they’ll find 2008 prices have doubled overnight. And, as people found out after ’97, those prices never really come down.

Some compare what might happen to what’s happening now in Zimbabwe, with 3,000% inflation. The worst of the skeptics and critics are shouting it quite loudly. It seems hard to imagine, but no one ever really saw the ’97 crash coming until it was too late.

——————–

I want to thank the amazing Thailand Crisis blog for assisting me with my research. I strongly recommend you visit and bookmark ThaiCrisis’ site to keep up with the real story behind Thailand’s economy and political structure.

For more stories like this on on Pattaya, plesae visit The Pattaya Ghost.

Could This Be A Turning Point In Thailand’s Future?

By Billy Bangkok

July 11, 2008

Let me echo the words of King Bhumibol Adulyadej, “If you don’t help to make democracy move forward, it will be the country’s downfall.”

These words first uttered in April of 2006 and repeated by the king several times since were aimed at the judiciary branch of the government.  King Bhumibol seems to be a wise man in terms of understanding that Thailand’s real legitimacy in the world will come via the application of law rather than through trading or other measures.

Transparency International, an international watchdog group, recently ranked Thailand below 5 on its 1 – 10 scale measuring perception of corruption.  Thailand ranks right up there with Greece, India, Mexico, Brazil, and Saudi Arabia in terms of perceived corruption.

Corruption in Thailand is so commonplace that not only does it not surprise people but they actually expect it.  Politicians blatantly break the laws and when caught red handed they offer the most absurd excuses and neither the press nor the people demand better.

But recently, fuelled by King Bhumibol’s words, the judiciary has been on a tear.  Corruption that would have been covered up just a few years ago is making it to the judicial branch and the judiciary has been very active in handing out painful rulings.

However the new PPP has become so used to a passive judiciary that they are still acting in a manner that shows total disregard for the law.  The new active judiciary is throwing a monkey wrench in the PPP’s plans though by handing down judgement after judgement weakening the PPP.

While PM Samak’s government is currently feeling the brunt of the rejuvenated activism of the judiciary branch it is former-PM Thaksin who may have made a monumental error when agreeing to return to Thailand to face charges of corruption.

Much like the PPP party in general Mr. Thaksin seems to have been under the impression that once his boys were in office it would be politics as usual and he would be able to slip through some loophole and come out squeaky clean on the other side.  Unfortunately for Mr. Thaksin the judiciary isn’t cooperating.

In addition to throwing out a lawsuit that would have invalidated the post-coup investigations of Mr. Thaksin the constitutional court made it clear they weren’t for sale when Mr. Thaksin’s lawyers tried to offer them a crude bribe.

Mr. Thaksin applied to travel to China and the UK and the constitutional court shot him down again which means that now Mr. Thaksin is truly stuck in Thailand and must face a court which hasn’t been very cooperative with his plans.

In the short to medium term the empowered judiciary will only lead to more political turmoil as fans of Thaksin will obviously be upset at rulings that go against their horse and opponents of Thaksin will likewise be upset for any rulings that go in his favour believing it’s politics as usual.

It will take some time for the judicial branch to earn the trust of the people.  The people will need to have faith that the judiciary is applying the laws evenly and fairly.  Unfortunately, they’ve been asleep for so long that it may be years before the people can put their faith in the fact that people are actually honouring the commitment they made when they took office.

There’s also a risk that a active judiciary attempts to usurp the powers of the legislative branch which would be just as bad as them being inactive.  The whole idea of democracy rests on a system of checks and balances that ensures that no branch can wrangle an unfair advantage over the other(s).

The next few months could be a major turning point in the future of Thailand both as a democracy and as a player on the world stage.  An end to corrupt politics might just open the door for a wave of candidates who run on a platform of transparency and fairness. A transparent and fair government could then open the doors for millions in foreign investment that has been too cautious to put money into Thailand.

It’s obviously far too early to tell which way this will break but it should be interesting to watch.

Overdevelopment Killed Pattaya, Phuket; Is Koh Chang Next?

By The Ghost

July 8, 2008

On pretty much any morning in Jomtien Beach, you can take an early stroll on the beach and find it carpeted with garbage. On Pattaya Beach, schools of dead fish and jellyfish have been washing up on shore for the past several weeks. Even seas off of Pattaya’s Near Islands are lime green and frothing with slimy good brought on by huge over populations of plankton feeding on the garbage in the water.

Morning Trash Heap

Inland the situation isn’t much different. Leave your windows open for more than a day or two and you’ll find your high-rise condo covered in greenish-black soot. Mammoth tour buses clog the streets and our lungs with their billowing diesel clouds. Sewers overflow during rainstorms, belching up feces and all manner of crap onto the streets. And, in Pattaya, every street or alleyway is a trashcan.

Quite simply, runaway development killed Pattaya. And it’s doing the same all over Thailand.

Witness a recent scathing report from the National Geographic Society on the ongoing environmental destruction of Phuket. NatGeo tasked 522 “experts” to assess the impact tourism is having on the world’s top island destinations on a scale of 1-100. Phuket only scored 46, meaning the island is in “serious trouble.”

“Chaotic development,” said one expert. “The Thai people do not realize what a beautiful island we have. They continue to over-exploit all the island’s resources. No building code harmonizing construction with the natural settings, especially on Patong Beach (ugly high-rise building). We missed the window of opportunity after the 2004 tsunami to clean out illegal coastal development. Very sad.”

Overdevelopment

“Phuket’s original charm as an astonishingly beautiful, unspoiled, and culturally rich destination has been completely lost,” said another.

“A planning disaster!,” said yet another. “(Phuket’s) reputation for bars and illicit activities overwhelm the natural charm of the Thai people. Prostitution and urban sprawl rampant.”

“Too much tourism development without a plan,” cried yet another. “Patong is a classic sex-tourism destination, probably worse than Bangkok. Some nice resorts and beaches. The water ‘looks’ fine, but is polluted.”

Critics were quick to jump on National Geographic, pointing out rightly that it appears it only looked at Patong. But the fact is by even the Thai government’s own admission, Phuket, Pattaya and Samui are polluted and overdeveloped. Phuket and Pattaya, in fact, were the first two cities declared “pollution-control zones” in the 1991 Environmental Act. That act, Thailand’s first “green” law, set environmental quality standards, designated conservation and pollution-control areas and awarded government cleanup funds.

The law, however, did little to slow Pattaya’s overkill development, which arguably has only increased in scale in seven years since the law passed.

“The economically successful Thai “fast track” model is based on the experience of Pattaya which grew from a fishing village to an international tourist resort in two decades. It is tempting to follow this model and results can be achieved at great cost, such as large foreign investments and the exploitation of sex tourism,” wrote Institute of South East Asian Studies professor Lin Sien Chua in her 2003 book, “Southeast Asia Transformed: A Geography of Change.” “Pattaya signifies uncontrolled growth by the private sector and environmental damage.”

According to Chua, fast-growth tourist destinations require 5 percent annual growth to develop. But 10% development, in all but very new resorts, leads to “overheating.” Development in Pattaya, by comparison, grew at an average 20% per year between 1981 and 1985, according to the Bank of Thailand’s National Statistics Bureau. Even since 1995, the bureau estimates GDP growth in Pattaya at 9%.

And it’s not letting up. Sifu Robert McInnes, president of developer McInnes Corp., has predicted property development in Pattaya will average 10% per year over the next five years. (Of course, he has a financial incentive to make the numbers sound good.)

McInnes also said he expects property prices to quintuple over the same period. With such huge increases in prices on the horizon, it’s no wonder developers are looking for “the next Pattaya.” And their target is not all that far away: Koh Chang.

Lovely now, but what about the future?

Located about four hours drive from Pattaya, Koh Chang is the fastest-growing resort destination in Thailand. This past year saw a bumper high season for this beautiful island of beaches and mountains. It has everything from five-star hotels to rental huts on a lonely beach. Marine and coral life is exceptional and its beautiful blue waters are clean and clear.

But the island is under pressure. Ten years ago there was nothing but bungalows along White Sand Beach. Five years ago it had one big hotel. Today all of White Sand is built up. Recently, local Thai officials, pushed by the hotels, have begun lobbying Bangkok for a water pipeline to stoke the island’s growth even more. Search the Blogosphere and you’ll find developer websites just barely hiding their exhilaration.

“With its mountainous jungles, waterfalls, unspoilt beaches and relatively quiet atmosphere, Koh Chang is an eco-lover’s dream,” real estate magazine Property Report was quoted on the ASEAN Property Blog. “The island’s western region is where most development is taking place, due mainly because that’s where the more picturesque beaches lie.”

While announcing that Koh Chang is indeed going to be developed in the country’s “next premium beach resort,” government officials have vowed to not make the same mistakes made in Pattaya, Phuket and Koh Samui. Authorities on the island have imposed strict building regulations and directives for beachfront developments, such as limiting all structures to a maximum height of three stories. To control the indiscriminate development that wrecked Pattaya, 85% of Koh Chang has been set aside as a national park.

The same promises were made, however, on Koh Phi Phi, which now has also been declared a pollution-control zone. Lonely Planet’s “Thailand’s Islands and Beaches” handbook from 2004 notes that authorizes have widely flouted the Environmental Act to build up the island.

That the same year Thailand’s Pollution Control Department surveyed 14 major tourist beaches and found that none of them fully met its stringent criteria on proper management that would otherwise help maintain these natural resources in superb condition, according to The Nation newspaper.

Overdevelopment epitomized.

“Beach areas such as Pattaya have become internationally infamous as examples of how development can lead to environmental degradation and pollution,” the ASEAN Regional Centre for Biodiversity Conservation wrote on its website. “These problems have now shifted to the islands in the Gulf of Thailand and Andaman Sea.”

In recent years, the Centre said, Hat Nopharat Thara off Koh Phi Phi and Khao Laem Ya off Koh Samet have been affected by the rapid growth in tourism activities. In just one year of tourist resort development on Samui, Phanga, Koh Tao and the Ang Thong Marine National Park, “coral reefs were significantly degraded to a cover of 20%.”

“Although the revenue generated from the tourism industry is high, environmental damage through habitat loss is usually not counted,” the Centre said.

All of this is not to say there hasn’t been progress on the environmental front. Indeed, in some ways, Pattaya is much cleaner and better than it eight years ago. Back then, t-shirts that said “I Survived a Swim in Pattaya” were as common as today’s “Bad Boys Go to Pattaya” shirts.

That all changed with the opening of the $60 million waste-water treatment plant that transformed Pattaya Bay from a steaming stew of raw sewage into technically swimable water. But in the past two years, Pattaya’s continued growth has hampered even that plant. During high season, the Pattaya Mail reported due to such high demand, only 60% of the city’s water was coming through the water treatment plant. The rest was direct from local reservoirs. So much for drinking the tap water.

Hotels are realizing, however, they have to start taking their impact on the environment more seriously. Aside from promoting “eco-tourism” — which Chua said in her book is “not sustainable” in Thailand due to low numbers and inexperience – hotels are now banding together under the umbrella of the Green Leaf Foundation. The group goals are to help hotels and related businesses to better respond to environmental development and protection; establish a nationwide classification of environmental standards in Thai hotels and raise awareness of Thailand’s travel and tourism industry in promoting environmental quality and preservation.

Still, all too often, Thais have only truly been motivated about environmental issues when non-Thais were the ones perceived to be doing the damage. Two of the biggest “green” protests involved the filming of Leonardo DiCaprio’s “The Island” on Phi Phi and the extended shoot of U.S. television series “Survivor: Thailand” on Koh Tarutao.

Thailand has taken its first steps towards recognizing that tourism and tourist sites must be developed in a sustainable manner,” a report from the Tourism Authority of Thailand stated. “TAT is committed to developing tourism in a way that is environmentally responsible, sustainable, and in harmony with the needs of local communities,”

The report, still available through TAT, was issued in 1997.

————–

This story originally was published on The Pattaya Ghost blog. Visit daily for more Pattaya and Thailand updates.

High on Rice

By The Farang

July 3, 2008

I’m not sure if Deputy Prime Minister and Commerce Minister Mingkwan Sangsuwan has been mainlining rice extract but I have to ask after reading this:

Mingkwan said the continuing trend would help turn Southeast Asia into a prosperous region, comparable even with the Middle East.

First let’s overlook the fact that Mingkwan has not sung a consistent tune during this entire rice incident (I’ll get to that in a second) and let’s focus on the assertion that rice will turn Thailand into the next Dubai.  That is his implication, isn’t it?   Unless I’m misunderstanding him and he was actually talking about other places in the Middle East like Lebanon or Syria. 

Checking Wikipedia, the common definition of Middle East is:

The Middle East defines a geographical area, but does not have precisely defined borders. The modern definition of the region includes: Bahrain, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, the Palestinian territories, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.

So what countries is he unlikely to be comparing Thailand to?  Let’s assume they are:  Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Lebanon, the Palestinian territories, Syria, and Yemen as they are either war-torn, in some sort of other geopolitical crisis that makes them unlikely targets for other countries to aspire to, or have a lower GDP per Capita than Thailand currently has.

That would leave:  Bahrain, Israel, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and the UAE.  So let’s look at GDP per Capita of each of these countries:

Thailand:  $8,000

Bahrain:  $34,700

Israel:  $28,800

Oman:  $19,100

Qatar:  $75,900

Turkey:  $9,400

Saudi Arabia:  $20,700

UAE:  $55,200

* source is the CIA Factbook

So unless Mingkwan was hoping to catch up to Turkey, his aspirations of comparing in prosperity to the Middle East would involve more than doubling the entire nation’s GDP in order to catch Oman and Saudi Arabia.  Regardless of how high rice goes that seems rather unlikely. 

The other problem is that Mingkwan must not be up to date on economics.  Unlike the commodity that brings wealth to the Middle East nations Mingkwan aspires to catch up to rice is not a finite resource.  More of it can be grown and the higher the price goes the more people will convert land for that purpose.  Nations that import rice like the Philippines might start producing rice themselves if the prices remain at such high levels.  Exceptionally high prices justify investments in irrigation and other improvements needed to successfully harvest good rice crops.  And as supply begins to catch up with demand then prices start dropping until supply exceeds demand and prices either level out or drop even further as economies tend to act on pendulums rather than precise timing instruments.  In other words, people will still be trying to get in on the rice bonanza long after the market has begun to swing back in the other direction and eventually there will be a glut of rice on the market driving down prices to levels that drives producers out of the market in an attempt to achieve that ever elusive parity of supply and demand. 

So contrary to Mingkwan’s pipe dreams, the most likely scenario is that in the coming year or two there will begin to be an oversupply of rice which will have a devastating effect on rice workers in Thailand three or four years out.  And instead of building golden skyscrapers in Isaan poverty will likely get worse.  But your lowly rice farmer probably knows nothing about supply and demand curves so this should keep getting people elected for a few more years so tell them what they want to hear. 

But that’s if there is actually a shortage.  Some are saying it’s a pricing issue and that exporters are hoarding stock in order to keep the prices going up.  In the Philippines where the shortage has become nearly a crisis the Secretary of Agriculture Arthur Yap told the BBC, "The problem is not with supplies, but with price."  People are holding back selling what they have hoping to get a higher price later. 

That would support the claims of Vietnamese rice farmers (as well as many Thai rice farmers) who claim they are not benefiting from the rise in prices. 

"The rice price has gone up 50 percent over the past three months, but I’m not making any more money because I have to pay double for fertilizer, insecticides and labor costs," said Nguyen Thi Thu, 46, a farmer in Ha Tay province, just outside Hanoi.

Another farmer, Cao Thi Thuy, 37, in Nam Dinh province, 120 kilometers (75 miles) south of Hanoi, said exporters have actually been paying less for rice over the last week.

"If the world prices are going up still, then Vietnamese rice-exporting companies are benefiting, not us," she said. "They tell us that now weather is better, and rice can grow more easily, so we should not expect higher prices."

Oh, and since I promised to follow up on Mingkwan’s flip-flopping, here’s a Breaking News alert from the Bangkok Post which isn’t dated but based on recent events must have been sometime in the not too distance past.

The idea of releasing a portion of rice in government’s stockpile was first floated by Deputy Prime Minister and Commerce Minister Mingkwan Saengsuwan and approved by the Cabinet on April 1.

But Mr Mingkwan changed his theme on Saturday when he chaired a meeting of 13 rice-industry and related-groups – presumably after talking it over with his prime minister.

Mr Mingkwan said participants agreed there was no need to release state stocks to the public.